BMF CP57: A Gravity Model analysis of Ukraine crisis impact on Germany’s trade patterns


Nguyen Manh Cuong; https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8068-3022
Noah C. Mutai; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9677-223X
Lawrence Ibehhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-5935-3464

Berlin School of Business and Innovation, Berlin, Germany

“It has been a very difficult fishing season. If we want to be full, we have to create a joint venture.”
– In “Joint Venture”; The Kingfisher Story Collection [1]

* Special Acknowledgement: The data used in this study was kindly provided by the World Integrated Trade System (WITS), managed by the IMF, UNCTAD, and the WTO.

1. Introduction

The Ukraine conflict has profoundly affected global trade and international relations, particularly for Germany, a major player in Europe and the European Union. This study utilizes a Gravity Model analysis to explore Germany’s trade network and assess the impact of the conflict on its trade partnerships. By examining missed opportunities and potential disruptions caused by conflicts, the research contributes to a deeper understanding of trade dynamics post-geopolitical crises. This knowledge can guide policymakers and stakeholders in adapting trade policies and sustaining partnerships amid conflicts. Germany’s economic well-being relies heavily on exports, making it crucial to analyze the Ukraine crisis’s effects on its trade dynamics.

2. Materials and Methods

This study gathers data on Germany’s trade and the Ukraine conflict, utilizing sources like the World Integrated Trade System (WITS) managed by the IMF, UNCTAD, and the WTO. The IMF’s trade statistics department provides trade data, while the World Bank’s World Trade Indicators database offers GDP, per capita GDP, and population figures. Geographical distance data is sourced from Jon Haveman’s database. Bayesian analysis was used to examine two forms of the enhanced gravity model [2,3], while Mindsponge Theory was employed to complement the reasoning of the gravity model [4]. To accommodate the exploratory nature of this study, models were constructed with uninformative priors or flat prior distributions, offering minimal prior information for model estimations.

3. Findings

Two models are fitted to explain trade flows between Germany and trading partners: a GDP and population models. Predictors are GDP, GDP per capita, distance, common language, contingency, year after 2014, GDP difference, population. In the GDP model, the GDP of the origin country, distance, and contingency negatively affect trade flow between Germany and its trading partners (see Figure 1). In the population model, the GDP per capita of the origin country and distance negatively affect trade flow. This model replaces GDP with population to solve the endogeneity problem.



Figure 1. Predictors of trade flow

Collaboration details

Portal users should follow these steps for registering to participate in this research project:

  1. Create an account on the website (preferably using an institution email).
  2. Comment your name, affiliation, and desired project role below this post.
  3. Patiently wait for the formal agreement on the project from the AISDL mentor.

If you have further inquiries, please contact us at aisdl_team@mindsponge.info

If you have been invited to join the project by an AISDL member, you are still encouraged to follow the above formal steps.

All the resources for conducting and writing the research manuscript will be distributed upon project participation.

Project coordinator: Nguyen Manh Cuong

AISDL mentor for this project: Minh-Hoang Nguyen

Other members who have joined the project: Noah C. Mutai and Lawrence Ibeh.

The research project strictly adheres to scientific integrity standards, including authorship rights and obligations, without incurring an economic burden at participants’ expenses.

References

[1] Vuong QH. (2022). The Kingfisher Story Collection. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BG2NNHY6

[2] Vuong QH, Nguyen MH, La VP. (2022). The mindsponge and BMF analytics for innovative thinking in social sciences and humanities. De Gruyter. https://www.amazon.com/dp/8367405102/

[3] La VP, Vuong QH. (2019). bayesvl: Visually Learning the Graphical Structure of Bayesian Networks and Performing MCMC with ‘Stan’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bayesvl/index.html

[4] Vuong QH. (2023). Mindsponge Theory. De Gruyter. https://www.amazon.com/dp/8367405145/



tags:   trade patterns