The Top 10 Philosophy Papers Published in 2021

Casual Philosophy

July 12, 2021

This feature article reprinted the introduction of the video published on Youtube by Casual Philosophy at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRr8-6Y7ASA. It has been lightly edited for an appropriate look per BMF style, with a reference list added to enable the reader/viewer to locate the papers more easily.

A summary of the most downloaded philosophy papers published in 2021.

Timestamps:

0:00 Introduction
---
0:11 Delusional Evidence Responsiveness
1:27 The Semiconducting Principle of Monetary and Environmental Values Exchange
2:52 The Seductions of Clarity
4:33 How Twitter Gamifies Communication
5:53 Generic Animalism
7:43 How Valuable Could a Person Be
8:41 Rape Culture and Epistemology
10:00 Consciousness and the Laws of Physics
11:21 Gender Muddle. Reply to Dembroff & Escaping the Natural Attitude About Gender
---
14:55 The Selection "Process" & Outro


Casual Philosophy’s The Top 10 Philosophy Papers 2021; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRr8-6Y7ASA

Download links:

#10 - https://philpapers.org/rec/FLODE-2
#9 - https://philpapers.org/rec/VUOTSP-2
#8 - https://philpapers.org/rec/NGUTSO-2
#7 - https://philpapers.org/rec/NGUHTG
#6 - https://philpapers.org/rec/BAIGA
#5 - https://philpapers.org/rec/BAIHVC-2
#4 - https://philpapers.org/rec/CRERCA-2
#3 - https://philpapers.org/rec/CARCAT-33
#1 - https://philpapers.org/rec/BYRGM
#1 - https://philpapers.org/rec/DEMETN

References

[1] Flores C. (2021). Delusional evidence-responsiveness. Synthese, 199(3), 6299-6330. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-021-03070-2

[2] Vuong QH. (2021). The semiconducting principle of monetary and environmental values exchange. Economics and Business Letters, 10(3), 284-290. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/article/view/15872

[3] Nguyen CT. (2021). The seductions of clarity. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 89, 227-255. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/royal-institute-of-philosophy-supplements/article/abs/seductions-of-clarity/5995DF2E11077CA54ED453A248E5A729#

[4] Nguyen CT. (2021). How Twitter gamifies communication. In: Jennifer Lackey (ed.) Applied Epistemology (pp. 410-436). Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/39388/chapter-abstract/339074130

[5] Bailey AM, van Elswyk P. (2021). Generic animalism. The Journal of Philosophy, 118(8), 405-429. https://www.pdcnet.org/jphil/content/jphil_2021_0118_0008_0405_0429

[6] Bailey AM, Rasmussen J. (2021). How Valuable Could a Person Be?. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 103(2), 264-277. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phpr.12714

[7] Crewe B, Ichikawa JJ. (2021). Rape culture and epistemology. In: Jennifer Lackey (ed.) Applied Epistemology (pp. 253-282). Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/39388/chapter-abstract/339072513

[8] Carroll S. (2021). Consciousness and the Laws of Physics. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 28(9-10), 16-31. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/2021/00000028/f0020009/art00002

[9] Byrne, A. (2021). Gender muddle: reply to Dembroff. Journal of Controversial Ideas, 1(1), 5. https://journalofcontroversialideas.org/article/1/1/136

[10] Dembroff R. (2021). Escaping the natural attitude about gender. Philosophical Studies, 178(3), 983-1003. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-020-01468-1